🧯The FAR Gets a Haircut: What Capture Managers Need to Know Before the Clippings Hit the Floor✂️

In a move that sent shockwaves through contracting shops and caused at least three procurement lawyers to faint into their redlined PDFs, the White House has announced a sweeping overhaul of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The stated goal? “To remove outdated, duplicative, and unnecessarily burdensome regulations”—which, depending on your perspective, is either a long-overdue spring cleaning or a harbinger of 1,000 ambiguous mod clauses.

For those of us in capture management, this is either great news or the beginning of a very long compliance migraine. Imagine telling your BD lead that the 1,986-page rulebook we’ve all been quoting like scripture is now getting redlined like a first-year proposal writer’s draft. Suddenly, all those years of memorizing FAR 15.305 like bedtime poetry might not buy you the same bragging rights.

But here’s the kicker: this isn’t just a bureaucratic haircut. This is a full-on style change. The executive order mandates the removal of any FAR provisions not required by statute or necessary for “effective, secure, and economical contracting.” That sounds nice in theory—until you realize we’ll soon be debating what “necessary” means with at least five COs and two lawyers, all before breakfast.

What does this mean for you?

Well, dear capture comrades, it means agility is back on the menu. The big government buyers might be shifting toward leaner, faster, more commercially-aligned processes. That’s good news if you’ve ever spent six weeks wrangling with Section L formatting requirements that seemed engineered by Kafka.

But don’t break out the champagne just yet—because with great deregulation comes great interpretive ambiguity. Fewer rules on the page might just mean more room for subjective evaluation, inconsistent application across agencies, and, of course, a surge in bid protests filed by those of us now even less sure what the rules are.

Bottom line:

Capture managers should prepare for a landscape where past templates and trusted assumptions may no longer apply. This is an opportunity to sharpen value propositions, rethink compliance strategies, and—yes—train your team to read RFPs like they were written in modern art haiku. Because, let’s be honest, they kind of are.

So grab your coffee (or something stronger), dust off that clause tracker, and get ready: the FAR is being reimagined, and we’re all about to find out what “streamlined” really means.

#GovCon #FARReform #CaptureLife #ProcurementHumor #FederalContracting #AcquisitionStrategy #GovBiz #ComplianceChaos #ProposalProfessionals #BDInsights #ContractingComedy #RegulationOverhaul

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Everything-as-a-Service? DOD’s AaaS Pilot and What It Means for GOVCON

Image
All Opinions expressed are my own. Once upon a time, back when the Federal Acquisition Regulation still felt mildly comprehensible, we had a relatively tidy definition of cloud computing. NIST Special Publication 800-145 provided us with a framework:  Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS), and Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS).  It wasn’t perfect, but at least it gave contracting officers, vendors, and program managers a shared language. Then Congress got creative. Thanks to Section 809 of the FY24 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the Department of Defense now has a new procurement experiment: the  Anything-as-a-Service (AaaS) Pilot Program . The name alone is a red flag. Anything? Really? And yes, they mean it. In early May 2025, the Office of the Director for Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy (DPCAP) released guidance expanding the definition of AaaS far beyond its cloud roots. Under this new model, a wide arr...
Read more

From Mandate to Method: How EO 14271 and OneGov Are Redefining Federal IT Procurement

Image
All Opinions are my own. For OEMs, it’s a windfall. For resellers, a reckoning. For advisors, an opening. On April 16, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14271,  “Ensuring Commercial, Cost-Effective Solutions in Federal Contracts.”  The order didn’t just encourage agencies to prioritize commercial technology—it made it federal policy. Within 60 days, agencies were directed to audit their open solicitations and justify any planned acquisition that veered away from commercially available, off-the-shelf solutions. It was the strongest public-sector signal in over a decade that government-unique technology buying needed to stop being the default. Two weeks later, on April 29, 2025, the General Services Administration launched the OneGov Strategy, giving the executive order form and function. Where EO 14271 articulated policy, OneGov operationalized it. It provided agencies and vendors with a playbook: leverage GSA as the centralized buyer, reduce acquisition duplication,...
Read more

The Pentagon’s New Acquisition Diet: Less Bureaucracy, More Swagger

Image
By someone who remembers when a DoD RFP had the word “simplified” in it, unironically. All opinions are my own. It started, as most federal shakeups do, with a signature, a pen, and a podium flanked by too many flags. On April 9, 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed   Executive Order 14192 : “Modernizing Defense Acquisitions and Spurring Innovation in the Defense Industrial Base.” If that sounds like a lot of words to say “DoD, go faster,” you’re not wrong. But in true Trumpian fashion, it wasn’t just a policy. It was a statement. A dare. A late-stage sequel to acquisition reform efforts going back to Goldwater-Nichols, with less red tape and more red meat. “Cancel it. Fix it. Or move it to the private sector.” At the heart of EO 14192 is a not-so-gentle command: The Pentagon is to  review every Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) —you know, the big ones, the billion-dollar behemoths that fund entire congressional districts—and determine if they’re behind schedule or ov...
Read more